Milk is a staple in almost every Indian household. Whether it’s for your morning chai, your child’s health drink, or a bowl of cereal, we trust big brands to provide a safe, hygienic product. However, a recent investigation by The Trustified Journal has raised serious red flags regarding the microbiological safety of some of India’s most popular milk brands, including Amul, Mother Dairy, and Country Delight.
Here is a breakdown of the lab test findings that every consumer needs to see. The Gold Standard: Microbiological Testing. When testing milk quality, the most critical parameter is microbiological testing. It doesn't just check for nutrients; it tells us:
- If the milk is safe to drink.
- If the factory maintained hygienic practices during processing.
The investigation focused on popular pouch milk (pasteurized) and Tetra Packs across multiple states.
The Results: A Cause for Concern
The lab reports for pouch milk from the biggest names in the industry showed startling failures regarding FSSAI (Food Safety and Standards Authority of India) limits.1. Amul Taaza & Amul Gold (Pouch)
Amul is a household name, but the pouch variants—Taaza and Gold—struggled in the lab.- Coliforms: Detected above the FSSAI limit in both variants.
- TPC (Total Plate Count): While Amul Gold was within limits, Amul Taaza failed to clear the overall microbiological parameters.
- Other Findings: Yeast, mold, and E. coli were detected. While FSSAI limits for these specific markers currently don't apply to milk, their presence is a point of concern for overall hygiene.
2. Mother Dairy Cow Milk
The findings here were even more drastic.- TPC Failure: The FSSAI safe limit for Total Plate Count is 30,000 CFU per ml.
- The Reality: Mother Dairy Cow Milk showed a count of 240,000 CFU per ml—that is eight times the legal safety limit.
3. Country Delight (App-based delivery)
Even "premium" subscription services weren't exempt.- TPC Failure: Country Delight Cow Milk contained 60,000 CFU per ml, which is double the FSSAI safe limit.
The Silver Lining: Amul Tetra Pack
Interestingly, the testing found a massive disparity between pouch milk and Tetra Pack milk.Amul Tetra Pack passed with flying colors. The lab report showed that no microbiological parameters were detected at all. Not a single microorganism was found, making it the only product in this specific test to clear the safety hurdles completely.
Why Is This Happening?
It is shocking to realize that none of the leading pouch milk brands cleared the tests for disease-causing bacteria. According to research published in the Indian Journal of Public Health, this isn't an isolated incident. In studies conducted on pasteurized milk in regions like Punjab, pouch-packaged milk consistently showed higher microbial risks compared to Tetra Packs.The failure likely stems from issues in the cold chain maintenance or the pasteurization efficiency at the factory level. When coliforms or high plate counts are present, it suggests that the milk may have been contaminated after pasteurization or wasn't heated/cooled correctly.
What Should You Do?
While these brands are industry leaders, these lab results suggest that "pasteurized" does not always mean "sterile" or "safe."- Boil your milk: If you use pouch milk, ensure it is boiled thoroughly before consumption to kill potential pathogens.
- Consider Tetra Packs: If you want the highest level of microbiological safety out of the box, Tetra Packs appear to be the more reliable choice based on these findings.
- Stay Informed: Follow independent testing journals to stay updated on what is actually inside the products you consume daily.